RandomX alternative
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2021 10:31 am
I had mentioned a month or so ago in chat my theoretical profit from VerusCoin (VRSC) compared to RandomX (XMR). The calculation pointed to VerusCoin being the more profitable of the two. Since RandomX seemed to be on its way to becoming unprofitable in the near future I was looking to an alternative.
Fast forward to now and I have some real world data that confirms my original theory. I took three low end laptops (early i5's) and one brand new i9-11980HK and set them up to for RandomX for a week. I then switch them to mine VerusCoin for a week. Used Prohashing for the RandomX and LuckPool for VerusCoin. Both payout daily so less impact over multiple days due to market changes. I also wanted to cover a range of CPU technologies as some CPU code set performs better than others. I wish I had some AMD CPU's to test with and they look to me better as CPU mining in general. RandomX used XMRig and VerusCoin used HellMiner.
At then end of the testing VerusCoin was 42% more profitable than RandomX for the entire group hash. Looking at the individual systems, all were more profitable mining VerusCoin with the newer i9 showing the larger profit difference between the two algorithms.
I did what I could to keep the testing fair, even going to far as to taking into account the fees to trade the VerusCoin into DOGE. Unless RandomX get back to the 5.5+ cents/KS/s, VerusCoin to be more profitable. This is not to suggest everyone drop RandomX. This is just my results over a set period of time. Do your own testing to confirm.
I know Raven is the next minable coin offering from Prohashing and I can't wait for that to happen but as for a CPU offering I think it would be profitable to not only miners but Prohashing as well. There is coming a time when RandomX will cost to much to mine. Better to get Infront of that before it happens by having an alternative.
Me personally, I have switch all my CPU's to VerusCoin. Would be great if that hashing power was going to a Prohashing pool but one can only hope that changes at some point in the future.
Fast forward to now and I have some real world data that confirms my original theory. I took three low end laptops (early i5's) and one brand new i9-11980HK and set them up to for RandomX for a week. I then switch them to mine VerusCoin for a week. Used Prohashing for the RandomX and LuckPool for VerusCoin. Both payout daily so less impact over multiple days due to market changes. I also wanted to cover a range of CPU technologies as some CPU code set performs better than others. I wish I had some AMD CPU's to test with and they look to me better as CPU mining in general. RandomX used XMRig and VerusCoin used HellMiner.
At then end of the testing VerusCoin was 42% more profitable than RandomX for the entire group hash. Looking at the individual systems, all were more profitable mining VerusCoin with the newer i9 showing the larger profit difference between the two algorithms.
I did what I could to keep the testing fair, even going to far as to taking into account the fees to trade the VerusCoin into DOGE. Unless RandomX get back to the 5.5+ cents/KS/s, VerusCoin to be more profitable. This is not to suggest everyone drop RandomX. This is just my results over a set period of time. Do your own testing to confirm.
I know Raven is the next minable coin offering from Prohashing and I can't wait for that to happen but as for a CPU offering I think it would be profitable to not only miners but Prohashing as well. There is coming a time when RandomX will cost to much to mine. Better to get Infront of that before it happens by having an alternative.
Me personally, I have switch all my CPU's to VerusCoin. Would be great if that hashing power was going to a Prohashing pool but one can only hope that changes at some point in the future.