Multiple groups per worker
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:15 pm
I'd like the option to let workers be part of more than 2 groups. Preferably allowing for multiple o= settings in the password
Everything I see in the documentation is pointing that o is a single answer, and in my own testing only the last o= is used.
For example I have 3 machines each with 1-3 workers on it.
Machine A: RandomX, Eth
Machine B: Eth, ETC, RandomX
Machine C: ETC
o=all would have all machines and algos under it.
o=MachineA would have its randomx and eth workers
o=MachineB would have Eth, etc, and randomx workers under it
o=MachineC would have the etc worker under it.
o=eth on all the eth workers
o=etc for all the etc workers
o=rx for all the randomx workers
So my password algo for the eth worker on Machine A would have o=all,o=MachineA,o=Eth for its group arguments. I would even be good with o o1 o2 o3 o4 o5, etc.
So now I have a snapshot of how each individual machine is doing, how the total algos are doing, and how everything together is doing.
I can throw out a prohashing request email, but I also wanted to see if there was interest from any other parties here on this functionality.
Obviously not super important compared to other stuff going on, but, I believe, a very nice quality of life improvement.
Everything I see in the documentation is pointing that o is a single answer, and in my own testing only the last o= is used.
For example I have 3 machines each with 1-3 workers on it.
Machine A: RandomX, Eth
Machine B: Eth, ETC, RandomX
Machine C: ETC
o=all would have all machines and algos under it.
o=MachineA would have its randomx and eth workers
o=MachineB would have Eth, etc, and randomx workers under it
o=MachineC would have the etc worker under it.
o=eth on all the eth workers
o=etc for all the etc workers
o=rx for all the randomx workers
So my password algo for the eth worker on Machine A would have o=all,o=MachineA,o=Eth for its group arguments. I would even be good with o o1 o2 o3 o4 o5, etc.
So now I have a snapshot of how each individual machine is doing, how the total algos are doing, and how everything together is doing.
I can throw out a prohashing request email, but I also wanted to see if there was interest from any other parties here on this functionality.
Obviously not super important compared to other stuff going on, but, I believe, a very nice quality of life improvement.