Page 1 of 1

more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 8:54 pm
by oppresseddude
This may be beating a dead dog, I'm really not sure why i have more workers than i do miners. I can't name my miners because it causes an error 'duplicate miner submitting share' or some such. I have a hunch it's because my miners having roaming IP addresses. Anyone figure a cure for this?

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 8:58 pm
by oppresseddude
One more fact to add is that this doesn't happen on Litecoinpool.org... not to be pessimistic about prohash. I just want to find a solution.

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:22 pm
by Steve Sokolowski
Check now. I think Chris fixed the network problems that were causing the issue.

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:31 pm
by lulzcart
it still doesn`t work

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:10 am
by oppresseddude
No the fix didn't work. I'm getting 'undefined: 914.681 M/s (2) · Scrypt: (1)' in the worker section. Shouid only be one worker.

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:06 am
by oppresseddude
With 2 miners, worker section is now saying 'undefined: 904.762 M/s (2) · Scrypt: 443.619 MH/s (1)'

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:15 am
by oppresseddude
with 2 miners now it says 'undefined: 1.407 G/s (3)'

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:16 am
by oppresseddude
i wish that hashrate were really true lol

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:48 pm
by alim
I get a similar message when rebooting the miners - I believe it is because the default for antminers is to test all the pools in order to kill any at the start in case failover is required.

The challenge is that due to the long pool time, the notice stays up for some time. I found that if I put in password arguments into each set including:

scan-time=7 expiry=28

that the message disappears quicker.

Hope this helps.

NB: There have been a few times when the miner shows that it has dual mined - eg submitted shares, but as I don't have an effectively way of checking the submissions, I am placing my trust that these have gone to my account.