Prohashing Mining Pool Forums

s=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 167.88.15.87:
Packets: Sent = 45, Received = 45, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms

hmmmm, looks good to me.

dog1965 wrote:s=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57
Reply from 167.88.15.87: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 167.88.15.87:
Packets: Sent = 45, Received = 45, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms

hmmmm, looks good to me.

Well, it would appear that the ICMP ping is working. Unfortunately, it's still having trouble with TCP, which means miners will still have trouble connecting.

Steve Sokolowski wrote:
We haven't heard from the lawyer today, and we need to hear from him before we can proceed any further. Until then, we're going to close registrations again.

We want to hire people as much as you do, but there are lots of rumors of representatives and senators wanting to introduce regulations that might make the business unprofitable. Once we get more certainty, then we may decide to move forward.

Whats the opposite of Progress? Congress! We were hoping to make a go of getting more miners in, but if PH doesn't expand, so much for my plans.