The most trusted, professional, and profitable mining pool.
http://forum.prohashing.com/
Minerman wrote:And the results are:
Profit:
Prohaching: 0.008537 BTC = 30.8 USD
Nicehash: 0.0078 BTC = 35 USD
Why do you talk like a complete a hole? If you don't like the way I check pools do it your way but don't act like a ass to othershashingpro wrote:This is a piss poor experiment you are running. You are not reproducing the environment to reproduce the experiment.CritterDog wrote:I am running a 24 hour profit comparison between litecoinpool.org and ProHash..Will post results in about 26 hours. Prohash still has a little under 2 hours then I will switch. Will post results tomorrow on how many Litecoins each pool pays in a 24 hour period. This is not to see which pool is better as profits change on Prohash. But I will run several test over the next week this should give us a better idea.
You are running a miner for 1 day someplace then on another day running that miner someplace else...WOW the numbers from 1 day to another are different...WHO would ever have thought that? FYI you could have run the miner for 1 day at PH, and then the 2nd at PH and guess what? The numbers would have been different from one day to the next even on the same pool.
IF you plan to run this type of experiment...Use 2 miners that hash at the same rates, and stick one on each pool for 24 hours and THEN compare.
You have to compare apples to apples, comparing apples to day old rotten apples isn't quite a good metric to measure on.
Ideally you would want more datapoints to get a better average. Sticking 5 miners on each site and comparing the profits. Or take the top and bottom rates from each of the 2 pools toss them out, and average the middle 3 from each pool and compare. There are many ways to compare and verify the data...one way to NOT do it, it to collect it 1 day at a time on 1 pool without getting data from the other pool you wish to compare for that same day.
You don't need to "tell me what I did" If you can't give constructive criticism without being total dick then get off your high horse or stop posting.hashingpro wrote:Next time bring valid data to the discussion then.
YOU grabbed sets of data from two sites on two different days and then try to bring forth some kind of conclusion or point?
Yeah I'm the A-hole here.
Well, apparently you DO need someone to tell you what you did, and that it was done improperly.CritterDog wrote:You don't need to "tell me what I did" If you can't give constructive criticism without being total dick then get off your high horse or stop posting.
