Prohashing Mining Pool Forums

lulzcart wrote:now it`s working fine here! btw you should also add Litecoin Cash to be mined on sha-256

Litecoin Cash's wallets are locked on all exchanges. If you'd like it to be added, submit a support ticket to Yobit and ask them to unlock their Litecoin Cash wallet. Once it's unlocked, we'll be happy to add it.

With 4 different algorithm on the same pool, the issue with intermixing rigs on same account and blurring ur profit lines, making it impossible to get an easy overview on how much each rig actually perfomered, We need to be able to split the profits up between algos to see how well different rigs are doing. Today only choice would be more accounts, and as there is limits on accounts or atleast used to be. So im curious is there any thought to sort this out or the answer is make more accounts?

-ended up in wrong thread-

mycide wrote:With 4 different algorithm on the same pool, the issue with intermixing rigs on same account and blurring ur profit lines, making it impossible to get an easy overview on how much each rig actually perfomered, We need to be able to split the profits up between algos to see how well different rigs are doing. Today only choice would be more accounts, and as there is limits on accounts or atleast used to be. So im curious is there any thought to sort this out or the answer is make more accounts?

-ended up in wrong thread-

The only choice right now is to create additional accounts. The possibility of being able to track statistics by worker name is something that has been discussed but is currently below improving the performance of the website on the priorities list.

Ideally, in June, we will add a "worker name" column to the share recording tables. Then, users will be able to create groups of workers to aggregate totals. Because of the database CPU and disk performance needed to write an additional row for every share doubles the number of writes for each group the user adds, we will need to evaluate whether the feature can be offered for free or whether customers who enable it will need to be charged a small amount extra, like 0.1%. If every active user added one group of workers per algorithm, it would require 16 additional cores, along with the minimal motherboard, RAM, and disks needed to make that a working computer.

We'll ask customers for comments before we move into the design phase on this one.

if you want to enable features for paying customers, why not enable them in donation teirs since you already have the donation function integrated

GregoryGHarding wrote:if you want to enable features for paying customers, why not enable them in donation teirs since you already have the donation function integrated

I want to change the donation function to allow customers to mine for charities instead of us, so it would have to be a new feature.

n=s9 c=digibyte m=solo a=sha-256

Is there any reason why this would show up as dead?

digibyte on here is scyrpt only.
remove the m=solo and c=digibyte.
OR, pick a different sha-256 coin to solo mine.

CSZiggy wrote:digibyte on here is scyrpt only.
remove the m=solo and c=digibyte.
OR, pick a different sha-256 coin to solo mine.

Any plans to add DGB SHA-256 support?

Shows it is working now, no blocks yet though