Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Forum rules
The News forum is only for updates about the Prohashing pool.
Replies to posts in this forum should be related to the news being announced. If you need support on another issue, please post in the forum related to that topic or seek one of the official support options listed in the top right corner of the forums page or on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
The News forum is only for updates about the Prohashing pool.
Replies to posts in this forum should be related to the news being announced. If you need support on another issue, please post in the forum related to that topic or seek one of the official support options listed in the top right corner of the forums page or on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
- Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Hi,
Someone is bring hashpower online to try to block Segregated Witness activation on Litecoin. We have the opportunity to counteract whoever this is by moving all hashrate to LTC at critical periods, which would either activate SegWit or significantly drive up the cost of blocking the proposal. The downside of this is that people would take a hit to profit for those periods and would only make LTC earnings.
If it becomes necessary, what are people's opinions on this? Is short-term profit more important, or should we push to activate SegWit?
Someone is bring hashpower online to try to block Segregated Witness activation on Litecoin. We have the opportunity to counteract whoever this is by moving all hashrate to LTC at critical periods, which would either activate SegWit or significantly drive up the cost of blocking the proposal. The downside of this is that people would take a hit to profit for those periods and would only make LTC earnings.
If it becomes necessary, what are people's opinions on this? Is short-term profit more important, or should we push to activate SegWit?
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
My opinion the profit of the miners is most important and should always go to the top
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
- CritterDog
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:21 am
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
I agree with this post.jinxorbit wrote:I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Agreed - let's move to counteract the LTC1BTC action and move to activate SegWit.jinxorbit wrote:I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
I think in all conflicts we should ask, why are we taking this position? Why is someone expending resources to oppose it?
What is the actual nutshell benefit of SegWit? Why are they attempting to stop it?
What is the actual nutshell benefit of SegWit? Why are they attempting to stop it?
- Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
In order to do this, we really need vinylwasp and ethercap to agree. Please try to get them to post here.excelerator wrote:Agreed - let's move to counteract the LTC1BTC action and move to activate SegWit.jinxorbit wrote:I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
If the three of you agree together, then I need to do the math, but we can probably cover the losses to pay miners who disagree.
- CritterDog
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 11:21 am
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
I think if your sure you have enough hash power to overcome the problem and get segwit activated it would raise the price of LTC.. It seems the price dropped when this hash rate comes on line against activation then when it looks as if its going to activate LTC price goes up..Steve Sokolowski wrote:In order to do this, we really need vinylwasp and ethercap to agree. Please try to get them to post here.excelerator wrote:Agreed - let's move to counteract the LTC1BTC action and move to activate SegWit.jinxorbit wrote:I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
If the three of you agree together, then I need to do the math, but we can probably cover the losses to pay miners who disagree.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Do we have enough hashpower between the three of us to "solo" mine LTC through PH and not affect the remaining community ie no losses that aren't voluntary? I currently only have 6GH so not sure I really make a difference but happy to contribute to the cause. I'm not a big believer in mob rule and PH certainly shouldn't be paying for losses. It looks like this could take days and I think you're putting your entire business at risk here.Steve Sokolowski wrote:In order to do this, we really need vinylwasp and ethercap to agree. Please try to get them to post here.excelerator wrote:Agreed - let's move to counteract the LTC1BTC action and move to activate SegWit.jinxorbit wrote:I think it is better to activate SegWit, we have seen on the BTC network the cost of indecision, bickering and loss of confidence. It is better to take a short term loss, than suffer months of arguing and price fluctuations.
If the three of you agree together, then I need to do the math, but we can probably cover the losses to pay miners who disagree.
We must look for a middle way. Perhaps something as simple as announcement to the community that all hash is going to be redirected to LTC @ X hour for up to Y days?
Last edited by excelerator on Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Agree to push Segwit. Especially to counter B**** Jihan. Latest hashrate spike is caused by L3+ miners who where suppose to be shipped out at Apr. 15th and now are delayed becasue of "firmware issue". So bascially Jihan and his buddies are now minning with sold miners who were supppose to be shipped out almost week ago.