Discussion about pool
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Discussion about pool
Good afternoon, Steve and Chris! I address to you both with the offer and with the request, or rather the problem with which we ran into p2pool bitcoin(jtoomim) here is the scanner node http://pools.mine.nu/scanner. And the thing is this, the asss for the recruitment of vorkers more than 226 pieces fly off the pool and refuse to work. We turned to the manufacturer Bitmain, but they do not want to help in this matter and just keep quiet. It remains an option to collect all the users of the node in one pool per vorker, but not everyone trusts, and you are one of the people who can be trusted, since I worked in your pool and received my income.
So if you made a separate stratum p2pool bitcoin(jtoomim) on your site, then you would connect a large number of miners who are interested in it, and you could switch your available 25-30 Ftx capacities and we would found the block bitcoin every 3 days, and maybe more often.
Excuse me for my English, I do not understand it, I use Google translator, if you understand in Russian, I'll write to you in Russian.
So if you made a separate stratum p2pool bitcoin(jtoomim) on your site, then you would connect a large number of miners who are interested in it, and you could switch your available 25-30 Ftx capacities and we would found the block bitcoin every 3 days, and maybe more often.
Excuse me for my English, I do not understand it, I use Google translator, if you understand in Russian, I'll write to you in Russian.
- Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Re: Discussion about pool
Thanks for contacting us. I moved this post here, where it is more appropriate.Lors wrote:Good afternoon, Steve and Chris! I address to you both with the offer and with the request, or rather the problem with which we ran into p2pool bitcoin(jtoomim) here is the scanner node http://pools.mine.nu/scanner. And the thing is this, the asss for the recruitment of vorkers more than 226 pieces fly off the pool and refuse to work. We turned to the manufacturer Bitmain, but they do not want to help in this matter and just keep quiet. It remains an option to collect all the users of the node in one pool per vorker, but not everyone trusts, and you are one of the people who can be trusted, since I worked in your pool and received my income.
So if you made a separate stratum p2pool bitcoin(jtoomim) on your site, then you would connect a large number of miners who are interested in it, and you could switch your available 25-30 Ftx capacities and we would found the block bitcoin every 3 days, and maybe more often.
Excuse me for my English, I do not understand it, I use Google translator, if you understand in Russian, I'll write to you in Russian.
I'm having difficulty understanding what the problem is. It seems to me that it would be possible for the miners to just use "c=[coin]" if they want to mine a static coin, and that an extra mining server has no benefit over that. Am I missing something?
Re: Discussion about pool
I think the OP is asking you to implement torrentblockchain.
A peer-2-peer, non server centralized mining practice done over torrents???
Because if you add that, then everyone interested in it would come here because other places trying to do it cant be trusted and this place could be and with so many people coming here from that you would find blocks so much faster.
Would the work needed to add that be worth the 226 vorker you would pick up?
A peer-2-peer, non server centralized mining practice done over torrents???
Because if you add that, then everyone interested in it would come here because other places trying to do it cant be trusted and this place could be and with so many people coming here from that you would find blocks so much faster.
Would the work needed to add that be worth the 226 vorker you would pick up?
Re: Discussion about pool
yes you understood me correctly, but not quite, I had to enter so that you switch your sha256 powers to this node http://p2p-spb.xyz:9334/static/ so that we can all together find the bitcoin block faster and all the others mine colleagues will register with you on the pool. Here is our telegram channel for communication https://t.me/p2pool, here there is a person who speaks English well.CSZiggy wrote:I think the OP is asking you to implement torrentblockchain.
A peer-2-peer, non server centralized mining practice done over torrents???
Because if you add that, then everyone interested in it would come here because other places trying to do it cant be trusted and this place could be and with so many people coming here from that you would find blocks so much faster.
Would the work needed to add that be worth the 226 vorker you would pick up?
-
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:01 pm
Re: Discussion about pool
in otherwords, they want your hashpower... NEXT!
Re: Discussion about pool
So if the pool switches nodes people will register with the pool and pool gets more hashpower.Lors wrote:so that we can all together find the bitcoin block faster and all the others mine colleagues will register with you on the pool.
So there isn't any real reason to switch the nodes then, as they can just simply register and use this pool as it is now and the pool has no need to switch.
- Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Re: Discussion about pool
Yes, I'm still not clear what the benefit is of such a complex arrangement. If they want to proxy those pools here, they can easily do that with static coin mining, or just by directing the miners directly.CSZiggy wrote:So if the pool switches nodes people will register with the pool and pool gets more hashpower.Lors wrote:so that we can all together find the bitcoin block faster and all the others mine colleagues will register with you on the pool.
So there isn't any real reason to switch the nodes then, as they can just simply register and use this pool as it is now and the pool has no need to switch.
Re: Discussion about pool
https://crex24.com/trade-api !!!!!!!!!!!!