more multiple workers than you really have
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
more multiple workers than you really have
This may be beating a dead dog, I'm really not sure why i have more workers than i do miners. I can't name my miners because it causes an error 'duplicate miner submitting share' or some such. I have a hunch it's because my miners having roaming IP addresses. Anyone figure a cure for this?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
One more fact to add is that this doesn't happen on Litecoinpool.org... not to be pessimistic about prohash. I just want to find a solution.
- Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
Check now. I think Chris fixed the network problems that were causing the issue.
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
it still doesn`t work
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
No the fix didn't work. I'm getting 'undefined: 914.681 M/s (2) · Scrypt: (1)' in the worker section. Shouid only be one worker.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
With 2 miners, worker section is now saying 'undefined: 904.762 M/s (2) · Scrypt: 443.619 MH/s (1)'
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
with 2 miners now it says 'undefined: 1.407 G/s (3)'
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
i wish that hashrate were really true lol
Re: more multiple workers than you really have
I get a similar message when rebooting the miners - I believe it is because the default for antminers is to test all the pools in order to kill any at the start in case failover is required.
The challenge is that due to the long pool time, the notice stays up for some time. I found that if I put in password arguments into each set including:
scan-time=7 expiry=28
that the message disappears quicker.
Hope this helps.
NB: There have been a few times when the miner shows that it has dual mined - eg submitted shares, but as I don't have an effectively way of checking the submissions, I am placing my trust that these have gone to my account.
The challenge is that due to the long pool time, the notice stays up for some time. I found that if I put in password arguments into each set including:
scan-time=7 expiry=28
that the message disappears quicker.
Hope this helps.
NB: There have been a few times when the miner shows that it has dual mined - eg submitted shares, but as I don't have an effectively way of checking the submissions, I am placing my trust that these have gone to my account.