Status as of Monday, December 11, 2017
Forum rules
The Development forum is for discussion of development releases of Prohashing and for feedback on the site, requests for features, etc.
While we can't promise we will be able to implement every feature request, we will give them each due consideration and do our best with the resources and staffing we have available.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
The Development forum is for discussion of development releases of Prohashing and for feedback on the site, requests for features, etc.
While we can't promise we will be able to implement every feature request, we will give them each due consideration and do our best with the resources and staffing we have available.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
-
AppleMiner
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:44 pm
Re: Status as of Monday, December 11, 2017
On the subject of stockpiling for a sha-256 reserve after what we witnessed with nicehash, three words: Multiple Cold Wallets.
-
Steve Sokolowski
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
- Location: State College, PA
Re: Status as of Monday, December 11, 2017
It doesn't make sense to only mine Bitcoin Cash, just as it doesn't make sense to only mine WildBeastBitcoin. We need to be able to mine multiple coins and switch between them. However, mathematically, the number of other coins we switch in is not relevant to the reserve needed to mine bitcoins.AppleMiner wrote:You mean mine the SHA-256 algo they don't currently offer to mine on this pool?centar wrote:Why don't you just offer BCash mining? Need a lot less reserves and you don't have to worry about those pesky fees you hate so much. Seems to align more with your personal beliefs anyway.
Check back closer to the summer and see if SHA-256 has been included then.
Re: Status as of Monday, December 11, 2017
AppleMiner wrote:You mean mine the SHA-256 algo they don't currently offer to mine on this pool?centar wrote:Why don't you just offer BCash mining? Need a lot less reserves and you don't have to worry about those pesky fees you hate so much. Seems to align more with your personal beliefs anyway.
Check back closer to the summer and see if SHA-256 has been included then.
Yeah, I was referring to his earlier post where he mentioned bitcoin's fees and current price as a reason why they couldn't implement SHA-256 easily.
Re: Status as of Monday, December 11, 2017
Ok, I didn't realize you were trying to get a SHA256 multi-pool running, I was under the impression you were going to offer Bitcoin only mining.Steve Sokolowski wrote:It doesn't make sense to only mine Bitcoin Cash, just as it doesn't make sense to only mine WildBeastBitcoin. We need to be able to mine multiple coins and switch between them. However, mathematically, the number of other coins we switch in is not relevant to the reserve needed to mine bitcoins.AppleMiner wrote:You mean mine the SHA-256 algo they don't currently offer to mine on this pool?centar wrote:Why don't you just offer BCash mining? Need a lot less reserves and you don't have to worry about those pesky fees you hate so much. Seems to align more with your personal beliefs anyway.
Check back closer to the summer and see if SHA-256 has been included then.