Accepted hashrate

Encounter a problem related to the pool or have a request for a feature? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.

Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.

We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.

For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
slawek
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:32 pm

Accepted hashrate

Post by slawek » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:09 am

Hello, unfortunately, please help please

What to do with this
Accepted hashrate: 5.97M

Rejected hashrate: 0

Efficiency: 100.00%
  


IN THIS same time with me
   | 11.18 / 16.01 / 15.91Mh / s |

Regards Slawek.

but that it is also fairly often
   | 16.69 / 16.13 / 16.42Mh me



the pool
Accepted hashrate: 13.12M

Rejected hashrate: 0

Efficiency: 100.00% but he is a big difference
am i wrong ???

Hot greetings from Polish
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:19 am

I'm seeing the same thing as our friend Slawek here... I think.

Since last evening at about 6 PM EST, both my rejected percentage and total hash rate dropped markedly as reported server-side. It looks like the server just stopped reporting/displaying the vast majority of rejected shares. My reported reject rate is now around 1%, which would be great except my total hash rate is fluctuating wildly, but seems to be averaging about 20-25% below what I see mining straight LTC. Before this last big release, I would have chalked it up to the idle restart issue... but that ought not to be an issue any more. I'm curious as to whether the efficiency drop I'm seeing is the result of an issue that can be resolved, or if it's just to be expected mining with a multipool as opposed to straight LTC.
User avatar
Chris Sokolowski
Site Admin
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:47 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by Chris Sokolowski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:11 am

I believe that this is caused by a bug that Steve corrected last night and just needs to release today. I will point him to this post so that he can provide more insight.
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:15 am

Excellent and Than-q!
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:21 am

kires wrote:I'm seeing the same thing as our friend Slawek here... I think.

Since last evening at about 6 PM EST, both my rejected percentage and total hash rate dropped markedly as reported server-side. It looks like the server just stopped reporting/displaying the vast majority of rejected shares. My reported reject rate is now around 1%, which would be great except my total hash rate is fluctuating wildly, but seems to be averaging about 20-25% below what I see mining straight LTC. Before this last big release, I would have chalked it up to the idle restart issue... but that ought not to be an issue any more. I'm curious as to whether the efficiency drop I'm seeing is the result of an issue that can be resolved, or if it's just to be expected mining with a multipool as opposed to straight LTC.
I looked into this issue this morning.

The rejected hashrate drop is correct. Previously, there were shares being rejected incorrectly because the server was comparing them to the wrong difficulty. 1% seems to be about average.

On the other hand, the total hashrate should not have dropped. I'll investigate that and see what I can find. The work restart time for your miners is only 1s, so it may be that the cause of the problem is not related to work restarts at all. Would it be correct to say that the total hashrate is simply the same 20-25% lower as it was before this update, which would indicate that the issue with your miners was never resolved?
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:16 pm

Steve Sokolowski wrote:Would it be correct to say that the total hashrate is simply the same 20-25% lower as it was before this update, which would indicate that the issue with your miners was never resolved?
Yes, that's what it looks like to me.
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Wed Apr 22, 2015 6:17 pm

We released a new version just a few minutes ago, and we fixed many issues. We're unsure whether your problem is resolved or not.

How are things working now?
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 6:58 pm

It took it's time getting up to speed, but it seems more stable now than before. I'll know better after a few hours, of course, but it looks pretty good at the moment
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:31 pm

Nope. Whatever the issue is, it's still in place.
User avatar
kires
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:25 am

Re: Accepted hashrate

Post by kires » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:37 pm

Also, maybe a silly question, but I should set "no-submit-stale": false, right?
Locked