I ran a test where I turned the miner diff up to 262,144. This brought the rejected share count to one. Yes, one.
This should improves profitability because fewer rejections equals more credited shares in a PPS system.
Thoughts?
Higher Diff improves share rejections
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.
We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.
For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Re: Higher Diff improves share rejections
Hmmm, I wont comment Because I dont feel like getting flamed.
- AppleMiner
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:44 pm
Re: Higher Diff improves share rejections
How did it alter the profits? Did it raise or lower them compared to one you didn't alter?
No stales but recording less than half as many shares would still be less profits.
Was the stale count the only thing that changed when you added the d= setting?
No stales but recording less than half as many shares would still be less profits.
Was the stale count the only thing that changed when you added the d= setting?