Search found 8 matches
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 9:10 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Notes about Verge earnings
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7441
Re: Notes about Verge earnings
Steve -- Some folks on the Cryptopia forums are saying that "it's working" now. Are the wallets still frozen?
- Mon Apr 02, 2018 7:59 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Worker appear as a line without any information
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7048
Re: Worker appear as a line without any information
Same for me....
- Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:24 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Poor Connection
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9447
Re: Poor Connection
@Steve - I have scan time = 1; how do I know if long polling is enabled? I am getting these messages in my output as well. [2018-02-24 20:19:47] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2018-02-24 20:19:55] Network difficulty changed to 18.3k (131.3G) [2018-02-24 20:19:55] Stratum from pool 0 detecte...
- Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:20 am
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6374
Re: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
After 9+ hrs of having a static difficulty of 4,096 (half of the target difficulty prohashing calculated with no difficulty setting), the performance was worse. Miner performance was down to 21.50. Hw errors were 0.94%. Rejected shares were a whopping 4.2%.... LTC earned was approx 0.0008424. Config...
- Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:06 am
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: #skipcbcheck Questions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2905
Re: #skipcbcheck Questions
I had the same observations as you. When I initially setup my prohashing config, I was getting a lot of coinbase check messages. I added it only because I read somewhere it gets rid of them. Like you, I don't exactly know the pros / cons of this.. Agree - the help only says it related to knc titans....
- Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:26 am
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6374
Re: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
Note --- After a full 24 hrs, I can confirm that I was getting .00235 / day LTC in litecoinpool, vs .00215 my first day with prohashing... (8% less). :shock: I've set my difficulty statically at 4,096. I don't know if that's an appropriate setting given the difficulty prohashing was targetting was 8...
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:15 pm
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6374
Re: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
For litecoinpool I found better performance by removing the difficulty setting. Prohashing appears to be dynamically determining the best difficulty, which currently shows as "Target Difficulty: 8,192". Per their help -- "If this argument is not provided, then the pool will select a d...
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:03 pm
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6374
Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
Hi - I just started to mine under prohashing. Previously I was mining under litecoinpool and wanted to try mining multiple coins. I see some performance differences and am hoping it's related to my prohashing configuration that can be tweaked somehow before I move the larger part of my setup. LITECO...